<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does Google Index Flash Content? Why HTML is Still a Good Choice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theoutsourcingcompany.com/blog/search-engine-optimization/does-google-index-flash-content-why-html-is-still-a-good-choice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theoutsourcingcompany.com/blog/search-engine-optimization/does-google-index-flash-content-why-html-is-still-a-good-choice/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 13:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: search engine ranking</title>
		<link>http://www.theoutsourcingcompany.com/blog/search-engine-optimization/does-google-index-flash-content-why-html-is-still-a-good-choice/#comment-3157</link>
		<dc:creator>search engine ranking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 05:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theoutsourcingcompany.com/blog/?p=779#comment-3157</guid>
		<description>WowI hadn't never thought the obviously simple ways a search engine like Google worked in. The issue is that even though it "indexes" your page abundant times, it still takes a metric tonne of effort on your part in order to get a site to become "relevent" to the big G. I guess this just adds to my understanding of search engine optimization!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WowI hadn&#8217;t never thought the obviously simple ways a search engine like Google worked in. The issue is that even though it &#8220;indexes&#8221; your page abundant times, it still takes a metric tonne of effort on your part in order to get a site to become &#8220;relevent&#8221; to the big G. I guess this just adds to my understanding of search engine optimization!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
